Archive for April, 2014

Play the race card, get out of jail

April 29th, 2014 | Uncategorized | 0 Comments

So now anybody can play the race card. Murderer and serial rapist Barry Whiteoak was discriminated against by the NSW Correctional Services Department on the grounds that he was British. In The Australian today I take a closer look at this appalling decision by the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal: 

Two weeks ago the tribunal ruled that this devious, dysfunctional, despicable human being was a victim of racism. They awarded him $500 compensa­tion, which mercifully will be redirected to victims of crime.  

More serious, however, are the two extraordinary assumptions underpinning the tribunal’s ruling. First, the tribunal accepted that the categorisation of prisoners is “a service” under the terms of the act. Second, the tribunal assumed that nationality, citizenship and race are synonymous.

If this is the case, we must rewrite the Macquarie Dictionary entry that defines race as “a group of persons connected by common descent” or “a group of tribes or peoples forming an ethnic stock”. There are other definitions, but every one of them links race to biology, as the word must unless it is to be stripped of any useful meaning.

Surely the tribunal is not claiming that everyone holding an Australian passport shares a common race, for that would be a killer blow to the race discrimination industry, putting hundreds of human rights lawyers out of work.

By devaluing the notion of rac­ism to nothing more than an arbitrary form of victimhood, the tribunal has not helped those who wish to defend the federal Racial Discrimination Act against the government’s attempts to amend it.



Head to head with a sceptic

April 26th, 2014 | Uncategorized | 0 Comments

What happens when discordant voices are shut down? We end up spending millions of desalination plants we don’t need, I told a sceptical Jane Caro on Seven Weekend Sunrise this morning.Screen Shot 2014-04-26 at 12.13.51 pm

Happy as a pig on the ABC

April 26th, 2014 | Uncategorized | 0 Comments

Screen Shot 2014-04-26 at 4.16.56 amIN Britain, Peppa Pig  is a proud and independent creature who earns an honest living on a free-to-air commercial television.  In Australia, Peppa bludges off the taxpayer as part of Mark Scott’s strategy to make the ABC ‘the baby-sitter of choice for every parent in Australia’. 

In The Spectator this weekend I ask:

Is this really what the ABC was put on earth to do? Where’s the public purpose in using public money to fatten up this cheeky little grunter? Is it the role of the ABC — or indeed any other public institution — to promote an anthropomorphic celebrity to kiddies while flogging its ephemeral merchandise through the back door? (The Peppa Pig Quilt Cover, price $39.99, will be arriving in ABC shops in June, incidentally.) In these fiscally restrained times, shouldn’t this particular little piggy be going to market?


Eco authoritarianism

April 23rd, 2014 | Uncategorized | 0 Comments

George Brandis’s observation in his interview with Brendan O’Neill about the authoritarian tendencies of contemporary environmentalists has provoked an illiberal response from the sophisticates. Adam Bandt told the ABC: 

If someone said ‘two plus two equals five’, would you insist on giving them as much airtime in the media as someone who said ‘two plus two equals four’?…

The science community is now essentially speaking with one voice.

Which was the exactly the point Brandis was making I think.

Alan Oxley in The Australian today has a troubling article about the thuggish behaviour of the World Wildlife Fund and Greenpeace who he says are running campaigns to tie up Australian farmers with green tape.

The declared aim is to save the environment: the real aim is to control farming…

The WWF strategy, laid out in its reports, is to coax or goad producers to join “sustainability” groups that set out onerous and costly green-tape rules.

Once producers adopt the system, WWF manipulates the ­organisation and toughens up the rules. Producers find themselves outvoted by WWF’s civil society associates and others in the supply chain, such as McDonald’s. When producers fail to go along, they get roughed up by Greenpeace or other activist allies.

In other words, it’s an old fashioned protection racket.





April 23rd, 2014 | Uncategorized | 1 Comment

The Anzac revisionists have misjudged the public mood, judging from the reaction to yesterday’s column. Here’s a sample from the Letters page in The Australian this morning:

Page 8

Keating’s war against the Anzac spirit

April 22nd, 2014 | Uncategorized | 0 Comments

As prime minister, Paul Keating made an audacious attempt to redefine Australia and its people. He failed. Yet his dismal speech at the Australian War Memorial on Armistice Day last year suggests he has not given up. 

In The Australian today I take issue with Keating and the band of revisionist historians who are seeking to diminish the spirit of Anzac.

Here’s part of Keating’s speech:

Screen Shot 2014-04-22 at 8.17.19 am

Devoid of any virtueThat’s what he said. In other words, Major General Herbert Cox must have been deluded when he reminded officers of the 4th Division about to depart for France in April 1916 of the virtuous cause for which they fought:

Screen Shot 2014-04-22 at 7.54.00 am

 The nihilist view of the futility of war has long been the default position of the Left, as Mervyn Bendle pointed out in a robust critique in January’s Quadrant.

 Keating’s speech is an impressionistic pastiche of cliches, generalisations and historical inaccuracies held together with faux moral indignation, and driven by hatred of the British.

Keating ignores the rise of German exceptionalism, its illiberal civic structure, its rapid industrialisation, accumulation of arms and its campaign of aggression against Belgium and France. He does not consider the consequences of a German victory for Australia: the loss of its imperial trade links and its induction, by force or acquiescence, into the German sphere. Instead he argues with our ancestors, telling them their sacrifice was “devoid of any virtue”.



The rights of the bigot

April 15th, 2014 | Uncategorized | 1 Comment

I count myself fortunate to be among the few who are paid to express an opinion. There are much harder ways to earn a living. Yet today’s column in The Australian was one of most difficult I have written, since I find myself supporting the right of a pernicious bigot to speak his mind without interference from the law.

When holocaust denier Frederick Toben was sentenced to three months in jail for defying a Federal Court order to remove posts from his website in 2009 I confess I did not look at his case too closely, since it is hard to lose sleep at the misfortunes of a fraudulent, anti-semitic revisionist who attempts to downplay a crime against humanity.

Andrew Bolt’s case and imperative of abolishing sections 18C and 18D of the Racial Discrimination Act, however, demand that we reconsider Toben’s unsavoury brush with the courts. Holocaust denial is not a crime in Australia, neither should it be. As I write in The Australian:

… when it comes to crimes against humanity, too much discussion is barely enough.

If the revisionists force us to examine yet again the banality of Hitler’s final solution, to re-examine for example the blueprints for the factories of mass slaughter built at Auschwitz in 1943, and imagine what might have been going on the heads of architects Walter Dejaco and Fritz Ertl, we are drawn irresistibly to Hannah Arendt’s conclusion: “The sad truth is that most evil is done by people who never make up their minds to be either good or evil.” If Toben’s grotesque distortions oblige us to re-read the testimony of witnesses like Primo Levi then he is doing us a favour.  Levi had the measure of these close-minded con men. He declared: “Those who deny Auschwitz would be ready to remake it.”

Here is Dejaco’s plans for Crematoria IV completed in the European summer of 1943.Screen Shot 2014-04-15 at 11.24.47 am


It was an attempt at an engineering and architectural solution to logistical challenges of mass murder, applying the logic of the industrial production line to the business of genocide.

There is abundant evidence to demonstrate that Toben and his ilk are crackpots, without resorting to the law.





Not your average Joe

April 8th, 2014 | Uncategorized | 1 Comment

‘One way or another, the Gillard years will come to be seen as a turning point in the 45-year old compact between the Labor Party and the intellectuals,’ I wrote in The Lucky Culture last year.

Illustration: Sturt Krygsman, The Australian

Illustration: Sturt Krygsman, The Australian

The grotesque end game is being enacted in Western Australia in the dispute between Labor senator-elect Joe Bullock and Senator Louise Pratt, who was number two on the party’s ticket. In The Australian this morning I note:

IT took Labor senator Louise Pratt five minutes to complete her ballot paper on Saturday, suggesting she had ignored her party’s helpful advice to vote above the thick black line.

“Am I sending a protest vote?” she asked waiting reporters rhetorically. “No. I voted for myself and I voted for Joe.”

Naturally so, since a failure to assign a number to her so-called running mate Joe Bullock would have rendered her ballot paper invalid.

The question is whether Pratt put him first, as her party recommended, or 77th, as she might have been tempted to do, given Bullock’s boorish remarks at a public meeting in November.




Presidential intervention on the limits of government

April 7th, 2014 | Uncategorized | 0 Comments


Screen Shot 2014-04-07 at 7.02.04 pmI’m no fan of the word meme, but here an evolving meme if ever there was one. In 1861, Abraham Lincoln wrote: 

The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves – in their separate, and individual capacities. In all that the people can individually do as well for themselves, government ought not to interfere.

The words come alive in President Barack Obama’s January 25, 2012 State of the Union address:

I believe what Republican Abraham Lincoln believed: That government should do for people only what they cannot do better by themselves, and no more.

In Canberra a week later, Tony Abbott addressed the National Press Club as leader of the opposition:

The current leaders of the Labor Party have failed to understand what Abraham Lincoln knew in the marrow of his bones: that government should do for people what they can’t do for themselves and no more.

It turned up again in October last year, this time unattributed, in the National Commission of Audit’s guiding principles:

Government should do for people what they cannot do, or cannot do efficiently, for themselves, but no more.

As I wrote in The Weekend Australian on Saturday, Lincoln’s epithet, as paraphrased by Obama and picked up by Abbott, has become shorthand for an argument about the size of government that is emerging as the new political fault-line in federal politics. 


Jeffrey Smart would have loved this Picture

April 2nd, 2014 | Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Fonterra's $235m milk powder plant at Waitoa

Milking it: Fonterra’s $235m milk powder plant at Waitoa

New Zealand has become the Saudi Arabia of lactose, I write in The Australian‘s Business section this morning. While Australia muses about the Asian century, the Kiwis are milking it for all they are worth.

Ten years ago Australia had a respectable 15 per cent share of the global dairy export market, and New Zealand enjoyed a not dissimilar share.

But while Australian milk production has been slipping by 1.7 per cent a year on average, annual production in New Zealand has been growing at 3.5 per cent.

This year Australia will supply just 7 per cent of the international traded market, but New Zealand will enjoy a 36 per cent year.

In fact there are now more dairy cows than people in New Zealand, but it is hardly a laughing matter. Coles departing chief executive Ian McLeod told the forum there would be 1.8 billion more affluent people in the world by 2025 before posing the question, “what is holding us back?”